international conflict Written by Howaida Awad Ahmed

 Conflict means the conflict of national wills and results from the different stages of the state's power and its available capabilities in its various material and moral manifestations, which leads to decisions or the adoption of foreign policies that differ more than they agree.

 However, the conflict remains without entering into an armed conflict.

 Conflict has forms, including political conflict, economic conflict, media conflict, and so on. The tools of conflict vary and range from the most effective to the most negative, including pressure, siege, containment, threat, and punishment.

 Negotiation, bargaining, temptation, concession, etc.

 The phenomenon of conflict is one of the constant and continuous features in human life, and the conflict may differ from one historical stage to another according to the conditions of technological and human life developments. The conflict has different aspects. It may be a political, economic, sectarian or civilizational conflict.

 Human history is nothing but the sure and clear record of human conflicts.

 Today's international conflict constitutes the general framework that unites all forms of human struggle

 It can be said that the World War is the first stop through which the United States entered the arena of international conflict, especially after the direct threat posed by the former Soviet ideological political change on the European continent.

 And if international wars and conflicts do not exist only to tear up a previous permissible treaty or to impose a new one, then the 1919 Treaty of Versailles did not end the international conflict. At the moment when Germany felt power, it abolished the treaty and added fuel to the international conflict and ended the concept of continuous peace based on injustice and illegitimacy.  I have to impose solutions from a position of strength without looking at the logic of justice, history, human principles, and even the nature of the laws of geography

 The international conflict was characterized by new criteria, and it rejected itself over the international conflict after the Second World War, the most important of which is the direct entry of the United States into the arena of conflict and the division of the world into a strong and a weak state. And to rich and poor peoples. And to advanced industrial and technical societies, and others suffering from economic and scientific backwardness.

 All facts and facts confirm that the modern world is not divided into east and west only, but also into north and south

 If the conflict yesterday before the fall of the Soviet Union, and the control of the United States on the new and old international system, a struggle between the two largest military allies in history, with appeasement, conciliation, non-hot confrontation and proxy war between the ideologies of capitalism and socialism, which are among the most widespread and influential ideologies today, even after the fall of the Union  Soviet.

 In addition to the Soviet-American conflict, a nuclear, military and ideological conflict, but at the same time an existential, cosmic and life struggle that includes all areas of life.

 Rather, it is a totalitarian struggle that engulfed the entire world and divided it into a socialist East and a capitalist West. It is a complex and overlapping struggle..Not everyone was able to comprehend its dimensions and complexities and did not expect its results by defeating Western capitalism, especially the United States of the world socialist system.

 The United States is unique in drawing the fate of many hotbeds of tension in the world without taking into account the logic of geostrategic and humanitarian transformations, and even the meanings of power itself.

 We find it imposing a peace treaty here, extorting wealth there, mortgaging the capabilities of future generations in this spot. It imposes and draws fragile borders that can explode at any moment there, and tries to undermine the dignity of people who believed in their nation and did not listen to it.

 And if the conflict between East and West was absorbed yesterday by the concept of international accord and proxy war, then the international conflict today, after the retreat of the Soviet leadership role and the bowing of Russian leaders to the raging American storm and the coexistence of many symbols of the Cold War with it.  This conflict arose before the collapse of the Soviet leadership, where he felt his footsteps at the height of the Cold War between the two poles.

 His first steps embodied his march in the Bandung Conference in 1955 and the resulting establishment of the Non-Aligned Movement. This conflict pattern continued in the subsequent decades to add another pattern to the international conflict at the time. Despite the fact that the former Soviet Union in many cases reached strategic agreements with the United States.  , in order to accommodate, contain and encircle the aspirations of the south.

 As for the current international conflict, it is characterized by an economic crisis that is exacerbating, which is the reason for many of the hot international confrontations. The Gulf earthquake was a major part of the patterns and exacerbation, the Panama and Grenada process, the confrontation with North Korea, and even the so-called new Middle Eastern market, all of which follow from reasons  An economic confrontation between the North and the South, and aims mostly at dismantling the national identity of the peoples and inserting it into computer equations that deal with the human being as a number and not as a civilized factor that has historical, ideological and strategic extension, such as the Middle Eastern market, which aims to introduce new international units in our Arab region such as Turkey and Israel at the expense of the nation  Islamic Arabic and its human specificity.

 Rather, he wants to give Israel existential legitimacy in our Arab entity