International crisis

 

 

 

I wrote

Howaida Awad Ahmed

 

 

An international crisis means bringing the problem to a dead end, and it also means that laxity in resolving or containing the crisis may lead to a clash or war. Crisis is a military term more than a socio-political term.

The situation that arises from the international crisis has the same effect on decision makers. They are events by their nature that are not routine or ordinary, but rather they are usually dangerous events that are linked to the highest interests of the state and are often accompanied by surprise and a short period for making a decision, with conflicting and scarce information about the event itself.

Because the effective parties to deal with sudden international crises must be prepared with very special physical and psychological preparation methods, and preparing these leaders to deal with opponents in the event that they are provided with biological information about their ability to carry out psychological pressure operations with political, economic and military measures in order to push them to certain positions favorable to the interests.

Nationalism during crisis.

The problem is that the leaders of countries and certainly their opponents in other countries do not make themselves subjects for medical and psychological purposes and do not allow political scientists the opportunity to monitor them during the management of international crises.

Both cases are in all cases considered among the secrets of the supreme state, and therefore states create for themselves leaders with the greatest scientific information knowledge, the ability to analyze, reverse the equation, change paths with multiple plans, and have flexibility in gathering and shaping the following events.

We have seen what provocative methods Israel is using to Egypt, and what is read and inferred from its movements is that it intends to escalate remotely by pushing Palestinian human resources.

In a state of desperation to storm the Egyptian border

In return, the Zionist entity smiles because it is watching and has nothing to do with it.

In return, popular pressure on the leadership increases

To open the crossings, thus becoming the first step to implementing the enemy’s goals, which is displacing the Palestinians to Sinai and then pursuing Hamas inside Sinai.

However, our conscious and wise leadership in their management of this sudden international crisis started by Hamas and used Israel as a pretext for goals greater than Hamas’ presence in Gaza.

The evidence of the matter is that Egypt is exercising deliberation and self-restraint with all anticipation and complete preparation for any option imposed by the circumstances of the situation in the coming months.

The people must realize the danger of any movement in managing the crisis, not only with Israel, but also with its American ally and those in the south, in Sudan, and in Bab al-Mandab, with the Houthis.

The period is thorny with serious events, and the management of these crises is managed with cunning, intelligence, vigilance, and careful waiting.

The international community and the Arab countries view Egypt as the tip of the scales and that its army is the large, cohesive, strong army trained in the region, but if Israel does not find help from America, weapons, and protection, its economy will not be able to keep up with the military plan.

It also knows that America has Egyptian and Arab interests that may be the obstacle to America abandoning Israel, even for a while.

The state of neither war nor peace in the region continues until the point of explosion or calm, the exchange of prisoners, and a return to negotiations with the parties, even for the millionth time.

The crisis papers are still open, and Egypt is preparing with all its might to defend its lands, its capabilities, and the renaissance that is taking place throughout Chad.